Which of the model protect,
allowing ecosystems to flourish,
preserving floras and faunas,
in the era of development.
Human-wildlife boundaries...
We have seen countries,
segregating, with strict boundaries,
with designated nature reserves,
fully separated by human activities.
It does help, when they have cleared,
exhausting resources, with extermination,
of any lifeform in their vicinities,
to have a clean, orderly civilization.
Then there are developing countries,
primarily relying on farming or foraging,
where these boundaries are blurred,
and follow principles of coexistence.
While some countries display tolerance,
even if population increases resistance,
providing ample space for wildlifes,
to survive in shared landscapes.
Each side have their drawback,
geographical isolation minimizes conflict,
undisturbed habitat for sensitive species,
but confining or displacing creatures,
that require migrations for genetic diversity.
Coexistence & tolerance provide cushions,
still prone to economic losses & casualties,
when there are unrestricted interactions,
leading to gradual ecological degradation.
Human-wildlife boundaries...
Now most countries developed policies,
pursuing conservations across nationalities,
what matters is proper implementation,
to create a balance...
Where natural world finds sanctuary.